Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, I use one of the big old foldy things, and think it gives pretty good shade at the same time allowing a pretty good view through the teeny tiny viewfinder. The lens itself protrudes a bit into the field of view, and the clamp for the SOOPD adds just a bit of extra diameter, but there's a window in the back of the hood that leaves only a line across the rest of the field of view (the top flap of the hood, viewed from the back edge.) When extended, it's a pretty formidable extension from the front of the lens, but it folds flat and adds only about 5-6mm of extra depth to the lens. I suspect any round hood that gave the same degree of shade would block much more of the field of view (I can verify that the IROOA, designed for 35 and 50mm E39 lenses and a slightly loose fit on a Summitar, does in fact block quite a bit more - and I don't think it gives nearly as much shade as the SOOPD.) I had two, and just sold the very nice one on Ebay but only got $26.00 for it. So they aren't a big investment for such a lot of nice German metal. Cheers, Kip George Hartzell wrote: > > I have a Leica III that I'd like to start shooting with, and I've > heard it said that its 5cm Summitar really would benefit from a hood. > > I'm curious whether people use those big old foldy things (SOOPD?) or > if there's a better alternative? > > g.