Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Canon 1.5 Bokeh
From: "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:23:50 -0700
References: <200105180235.TAA25031@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us><009401c0df7e$5f2caa90$4d02a8c0@neurosoft.lan> <3.0.6.32.20010518123842.00e9ed30@pop.infi-net.mindspring.com>

Do you know what year the multi coating began?

Roland Smith
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc James Small" <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Canon 1.5 Bokeh


> At 08:44 AM 5/18/2001 -0500, Dante A. Stella wrote:
> >Good point about the curvature.  The Canon is a Sonnar copy, but better
> >executed than the Soviet copy (and without benefit of the Zeiss tooling!)
> >
>
> That's a pretty broad brush to use to describe a lens which was in
> production for 45 years.  In general, yes, the mounts on Nikon and Canon
> LTM lenses are far better made than those on the Soviet/Post-Soviet
lenses.
>  But there is generally not much to choose between the glass, SPS QC being
> its customary concern.  However, the late Jupiter production has better
> mounts than the earlier lenses and most of these lenses are multi-coated.
>
> Marc
>
> msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
> Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Richard W. Hemingway" <rheming@attglobal.net> (Re: [Leica] Canon 1.5 Bokeh)
Message from "Stanislaw B.A. Stawowy" <watteau@krakow.neurosoft.net> (Re: [Leica] Canon 1.5 Bokeh)
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> (Re: [Leica] Canon 1.5 Bokeh)