Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]apbbeijing wrote: > > Peter > > That is very interesting. I know how impressive the 6x17 images are - > wonderful as transparencies especially. I know some agencies dupe up all the > 35mm panoramics onto 6x17 because they sell better but of course the quality > is not to same. Printing 6x17 is troublesome in most places. > ><Snip> I just checked the website of Panoramic Images, Ltd. (which is in Chicago) http://www.panoramicimages.com/home.html their hundreds of clickable thumbnails are all in the 6x17 format horizontal. But a cover page layout showed a 6x12 and some verticals. A 6x12 will fit in an 4x5 enlarger. A 6x12 to me is still a rectangle and not a strip that you read left to right. (Or right to left) a 6x12 is close to what you see when you go to the movies. I like that, I'm used to that. It feels right to me. A 6x12 gives you 6 on a roll of 120, heck you can bracket! a 6x12 is an antiformat. It looks more original that the typical formats, 6x17 being one of them. To print a 6x12 you can cut paper in half but if you stick to using a full sheet it looks pretty good. You don't have to have a second stack for a separate panoramic portfolio. I get 1/2 (one over two) when i use the 60x30 mask with my Hasselblad which i do often so i have some experience with it's mise en page. When Hasselblad came out with its "medium format" 35mm panoramic point and shoot the XPAN i was surprised that the format turned out to me 24x65. The Hasselblad square itself is 55! and 24x55 which is what you get when you use a mask with the Mamiya 6 is a good step wider than 6x12! A 2.25 aspect ration instead of 2. (6x17 is 2.83 as i figure it). They wanted the XPAN to compete against i guess the very popular 6x17 format, a 6x17 point and shoot! What a mistake. When they make one which gives me more on a roll I'll think about getting one. Like somewhere between 24x48 and 24x55! I'd love a Hasselblad back which gives me 24 60x30's on a 120 roll! When i shoot 630 with my 645 I'm flushing a tad more silver down the drain than I'd care to and getting 16 on a roll. But it's not a bad deal all in all the contacts look ok. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/