Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Fiction
From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 20:18:32 -0400
References: <B7213311.DD45%apbbeijing@yahoo.com> <4.1.20010510082710.0211b800@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>

At 04:22 PM 5/10/2001 -0700, Jim Brick wrote:
>Leica didn't make film or copiers. Just optics,
>cameras, and paraphernalia that supports this line. So the Leica (Leitz)
>heritage is sort of all in the same vein. Still doing today, what Oscar
>started nearly a century ago.
>

PUH-LEEZE, Jim!  Do not abuse Leica's history so!  Oscar Barnack did NOT
start Leica!  The company was founded by Karl Kellner in 1849, and it was
quite a few years before the first Leitz walked through the door.  The
company were microscope specialists -- STILL an important part of the Leitz
line and heritage!  Barnack was hired as a mechanical and optical
interface, a workman who could capably design the mechanicals around
optical systems.  His major assignment, early on, was in an effort to
produce a cine camera for microscopic use and, on this, he worked with an
old friend, Mechau, the person responsible for Barnack's leaving
Zeiss-owned ICA to come to work at Leitz.  (The ultimate reason, though,
seems to have been health insurance:  shades of Hillary Clinton, but
Barnack had asthma and was so barred fromt he Zeiss Executive Health-Care
Plan -- but Leitz put him into THEIR plan.  Don't downplay the import of
Health-Care Plans to make Employees happy, you reactionaries!)

Leitz ALWAYS made far more money from microscopes and the like than from
cameras.  We are the fans of the tail that wagged the dog, and we tend to
neglect this realization.  MICROSCOPES!  Medical gear.  Fancy laboratory
stuff.  Igor and all that.  Doctor Frankenstein.  Hollywood missed the
ultimate adornment to a Boris Karloff set, that Leitz Model VIIc brass
microscope in the background.  Leitz DID run out of money, in part, because
of cameras but, also, because they could not compete, on the economy of
scale, with Carl Zeiss and, even worse for them, Nikon and Pentax, in their
medical and microscopy stuff.  Viso died NOT because we photographers
avoided it, as we, most assuredly, did not -- Viso died because all those
doctors were snappin' away with Nikon or Contarex cameras.

Shucks.  How mundane reality can be.  But so it is.

Marc
 
msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!