Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Film Demise
From: "mdelman" <mdelman@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 05:51:39 -0400
References: <002101c0c993$d0fb4ec0$4d02a8c0@neurosoft.lan> <5.0.1.4.0.20010420095611.00a821f0@206.34.200.40> <l03130300b706849cc9c6@[216.40.161.63]>

Ken:

I'm a new Leica user and just purchased an M6 classic and a used 90mm
tele-elmarit M.  The noctilux is probably an investment for me down the road
a bit due to its high cost and my need for a 35mm as a higher priority.
I'll probably use fast film for any delivery room shots.
- -Mark
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Wilcox" <wilcox@tir.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:29 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Film Demise


> Mark:
>
> It is widely believed here on the LUG that the birth of a child requires a
> Noctilux for delivery room pictures. Do you have yours yet?
>
> Ken Wilcox
>
> At 7:09 -0400 4/20/1, a fine scholar, mdelman wrote:
>
> >I have my first baby on the way in July.  I'll let you know if I feel
> >differently then, but for now....
>
>
> ----
> Ken Wilcox                                Carolyn's Personal Touch
Portraits
>   preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com>
>           <kwilcox@gfn.org>
>
>
>

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Film Demise)
Reply from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: Re: Film Demise)