Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, A colleague and fellow lugger, who used to use a lot of KM recently thought he would try it out again. His comment was along the lines of never again. Sent out to wherever Kodak processes in Canada now - film back in terrible condition, dirt, crap, spots - the works. Put me off using up those last few rolls (Oh that, and the time a few years ago when they neatly sliced through the centre of each frame and mount half of two different images in each frame mount - these were shots of Iqaluit up in the arctic, shots of I place I haven't been able to return to since - Kodak's response? They sent me a new roll of film). Tim A > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Tarek > Charara > Sent: April 4, 2001 2:51 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: K64 vs. Provia F > > > le 04.04.2001 5:37, Nathan Wajsman à wajsman@webshuttle.ch a écrit : > > > I do use the Provia F films as well, but when I have the slides > on a light > > table > > and look at them with a good loupe, or when I project them with my Leica > > Colorplan projection lens, the Kodachrome slides clearly stand > out in terms of > > sharpness and crispness. Their color rendition is neutral, > which is what I am > > looking for. > > Nathan, > > I stopped KR25 because I thought it had a reddish/pinkish look to it. > > Tarek >