Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] 12/5.6 Voigtlander
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 21:50:48 -0400
References: <200104020239.TAA09971@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <3.0.6.32.20010402102914.009af560@POP6.sympatico.ca> <3.0.6.32.20010402182015.009ccd60@POP6.sympatico.ca>
 
Probably.   B&W 92 (89B) as well as 87 filters seem to have skyrocketed in
price since I picked up mine for about 5 bucks each.   But for me a #25
filter is just as effective for the sort of work I do.  I don't really need
a "pure" infrared image.

dan c.

At 06:20 PM 02-04-01 -0700, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
>Would an IR filter in 77 mm cost about as much as the lens itself?
In reply to: Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] 15mm Heliar--Vignetting & Underexposure)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> ([Leica] 12/5.6 Voigtlander)