Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Jupiter 85 - Pt 1 [was Flare + Jupiter]
From: "Stanislaw B.A. Stawowy" <watteau@krakow.neurosoft.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:42:04 +0200
References: <v04011708b6e70ac7d3ad@[32.101.147.163]>

> >Uhm.. We are talking Jupiter 12 (2.8/35) here. This lens
> >have sunshade built-in..
> >Jupiter 9 (2/85) is a Sonnar copy. As such, it has only
> >three groups and six air-glass surfaces. Such a design has a
> >little flare from day 0.. :-)
> >--------
> >St.
> 
> 
> No, we are talking about the Jupiter 9. Read on.

No. Flare thread was started with Jupiter 12. Your turn... :)

> I'm in the look for a Jupiter-9 85mm f2. I've looked in the archives
> for comments on this lens, but there's one thing I cannot find: What
> years are the safest to go with?  I'll probably be buying from ebay,
> unless someone suggests a good source for these things in the San
> Francisco bay area, so I won't be able to try before I buy.
> 
> Are lenses older than 1965 better, should I go with one from the late
> 70's, does it matter at all?

My experience is that earliest ones and latest ones are the best. 
I observed something like peak of quality at 1975 - 1978 and then
total disease in 80-th, but you definitely should check this by 
yourself. I like black, coated ones, if you like chrome then, well,
buy chrome. But YMMV, for me Elmar 4/90 is thae way to go, just
bacause I want something LIGHT.. :-)

greetz
- -----                                
                                St.
                     (Stanislaw B.A. Stawowy)
              http://www.geocities.com/Stanislaw_Stawowy
            Echelon/Carnivore lines: Bob Black, Hakim Bey, 
           Ralph Klein, Sabotage in the American Workplace

In reply to: Message from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] Jupiter 85 - Pt 1 [was Flare + Jupiter])