Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use"
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:01:17 -0800
References: <006001c0b6b4$9bbb8460$b1111840@dimarcojr.pressroom.com> <003d01c0b6cb$a8748a00$511a4d18@gv.shawcable.net> <3AC0EB6A.D570C17A@webshuttle.ch> <01b701c0b71b$4d68fce0$511a4d18@gv.shawcable.net>

><Snip> 
> So how you made the prints to me is completely irrelevant as it's the
> content that counts not the medium they are printed on. Unless one is a
> stuffy museum curator! ;-)
> 
> Does that not sound reasonable?
> ted
> Ted Grant Photography Limited
> www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant

I'm getting ready to mat and frame up some inkjets for my walls and i don't
think anyone is going to guess that they are not C prints or Ciba or Fuji direct
positive. (photographs)
Or that some are RC.
To me an RC print behind glass is just as much of a sacrilege as an inkjet. If
not more so.
So finally I say screw it!
Glass is the common denominator! The F11 of Art presentation. The great leveler. 
Behind glass how does it look?



Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon
USA
Updated ALL MY DESIGN webpage!!
http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
Chick the "personal work" Link!
and "tears" a few "family scans"

In reply to: Message from "Sal DiMarco,Jr." <sdmp007@pressroom.com> ([Leica] Re: SNAPS & England & the LHS)
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> ([Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] WAS: SNAPS & England & the LHS: NOW "snaps use")