Re: [Leica] Zoom Saga

[Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>]

Stuart Boyd wrote:
> 
> I'm have just consulted with a relative who is an attorney,  and related to
> him the SAGA of this lens.  He informs me that all U.S. states, and the
> federal government, and probably all foreign countries,  have various laws
> (civil, and criminal) covering fraud, and intentional misrepresentation of
> facts for personal gain, or in which there is injury to others.  These apply
> to a broad spectrum of activities, including sales in which there is an
> intentional misrepresentation, which can be proven, and results in injury to
> others.  And this does apply to attempting to sell something that you don't
> have authorization to sell, if (assuming there is an injured party) the
> injured party wished to pursue.  Now, whether or not the law would be
> applied if there was no harm done, is another matter.  Please look up the
> definition of fraud in a dictionary!!!!!!

"injured party"
So much of law is dependent on the proof of injury!
Paper chase was on last night, hadn't seen that in a while.
John Housemen was one scary dude! 
I interviewed and auditioned for in at Julliard in 1973.

mark rabiner