Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M ASPH vs. 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M pre-asph
From: "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@terra.es>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 11:11:32 +0100
References: <001601c0a3c5$9620f140$b52ffea9@sander>

Sander,
You should have tried the pre-asph 35mm summilux. The difference between the
inner and outer areas was even greater. There is a danger with this bokeh
argument however, the asph lenses are being described as having 'harsher'
bokeh and I just don't see it. What you want sharp is sharp, and what you
want out of focus is uniformly creamy.

Julian

Julian

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Sander van Hulsenbeek" <vanhulsenbeek@wxs.nl>
To: "Leica-Users" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>;
<goldframe1@yahoo.com>; <henry@henryambrose.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M ASPH vs. 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M
pre-asph


> Look at the following webpage with a bokeh comparison of the two lenses
> I love my ASPH!
> Sander van Hulsenbeek
> Amsterdam Holland
>
> http://home.wxs.nl/~sanderva/SummiTest.htm
>
>

In reply to: Message from "Sander van Hulsenbeek" <vanhulsenbeek@wxs.nl> (Re: [Leica] 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M ASPH vs. 35mm f2.0 Summicron-M pre-asph)