Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>I like having the 28m and the 21mm, both are useful additions to have when >the 35mm won't do. Really like both but if I had to give up one it would be >the 28mm, when you need a super-wide the 21mm is one terrific lens. Had it >3 years and I'm still getting the hang of it though. I had the 15 mm Voigtländer for a while, and the main advantage of that lens was that it taught me how to use my 21mm. I have got rid of the 15 mm but now use the 21mm much more often than I did before. Having had the 15mm, the 21mm now seems quite normal. (My other lenses are 35 and 90mm.) >When my wife and I >were at Grand Canyon and Arches Nat'l Monuments we both were impatient to >get the 21mm lens from one another. Super quality for the angle of view - >everything an M lens and an M6 should be. Agreed. >gold >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Duri Koenz >Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 8:10 AM >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: [Leica] Wide angle lens > >Hello dear friends > >I have an M6 with 35, 50, 90 and 135mm lenses. Now I feel the need for a >real wide angle lens. I was thinking of the 15mm Voigtlaender Heliar. Is >the jump to big, are there alternatives, what do you suggest? > >Duri - -- Christer Almqvist D-20255 Hamburg, Germany and/or F-50590 Regnéville-sur-Mer, France