Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doug Richardson wrote: > If any LUG members are involved in the cinema industry, could they > tell me: > If the lenses are manually focussed to preset distances, does that > mean that the focussing is engraved to be read by someone standing in > front of the lens, rather than by someone standing behind the camera - > i.e the distance values are engraved 'upside-down' compared with those > on a 35mm still camera lens? I can't say for all cine lenses, but many of the ones that I have used have their focussing index on the side of the lens, rather than on top. Focussing is done by the focus puller standing in front of the camera operator, to the side of the camera. A focusing wheel is connected to a gear that rotates the focussing ring on the lens. Paper disks are put on the wheel so that the focus puller can mark the focus points for a shot with a permanent marker. These are often numbered sequentially and correspond with tape marks on the ground or other visual references outside of the frame. Older lenses are no designed for follow-focus gears, but are often engraved so that the camera operator can see the distance markings with his/her left eye while shooting. This is an art which requires much practice, of course. > Do cine lenses have depth-of-field markings similar to those on > still-camera lenses? No. Depth-of-field values are usually looked-up in a reference manual, such as the "American Cinematographer Manual," published by the American Society of Cinematographers (a.k.a. ASC, an acronym that you will no doubt recognize from film credits). I don't know about your lens, but I would hazard a guess that it was meant to be used on a copy stand, with the camera facing down. Or that it was assembled by Snah... Bernard