Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Come on...What's $3000 among friends. You're not suggesting for a minute, are you that the quality of image provided by the Leica lens isn't at least $3000 better than the Canon or Nikon image, are you? ;-) David Freedman wrote: > But not here in the U.S. B&H prices as follows: > > Canon 300/2.8 IS $4750 > Nikon 300/2.8 AF-S $4800 > > Leica 280/2.8 $7590 > > Dave F. > >> Gerry, >> >> You are correct. For long lenses, Leica lenses are actually LESS > > expensive. > >> For example, either a Canon or Nikon 300/2.8 costs more than the Leica R > > APO > >> Telyt Modular 280/2.8 (11841 + 11843). >> >> Cheers, >> >> Joseph >> >>