Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: "less than efficient Rollei service22?=
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:28:30 -0800
References: <20010222015254.13635.qmail@larch.math.umn.edu> <20010222225612.31867.qmail@mail.netconnect.com.au>

><Snip> 
> I must have missed the query earlier. I like the QZT. It is solid, well
> built, has a fantastic lens, produces high quality contrasty images,
> focuses quickly (relatively) and has been reliable and accurate. For a snap
> point and shoot camera, the lack of on board flash is a bit of a pain, but
> the flash images are much better because of having an off camera flash. I
> worry that the flash will stop working and will not be repairable in the
> future, but that is in the future. I do not use it enough to really have
> justified its purchase, but it is a wonderful piece of machinery. Not quite
> "good" enough to be a serious camera (ie it cannot challenge the M6) as it
> does not allow filters etc, relies solely on autofocus (no manual
> rangefinder) and too good for a simple point and shoot. Takes nice snaps
> though ;-)
> 
> Cheers

I just saw it at cameraworld an hour ago it's about the same size as an M6.
Give me a point and shoot have that size and i'll think about it.

mark rabiner

In reply to: Message from goldman@math.umn.edu ([Leica] Re: "less than efficient Rollei service?")
Message from firkin@netconnect.com.au ([Leica] Re: "less than efficient Rollei service22?=)