Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] loco for chrome?
From: "Sal DiMarco,Jr." <sdmp007@pressroom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:29:29 -0500

B.D. wrote:
"I can't help wondering how HCB, Eugene Smith, Robert Capa, Inge Morath,
Eisenstadt, or George Rodgers (FYI- It's Rodger, not Rodgers) ever got
through a day without obsessing about the color, finish, and metallurgics of
their equipment."

Guy asked:
"How do you know they didn't?"

Well, gentlemen, maybe I can be of service....
    One day while dropping off some film for TIME magazine, I ran into
Eisie. He spotted one of my black paint Leicavit MP equipped M4s and asked
to see it. He asked me why I wasted my money for on the black paint cameras.
I said, "Er, well, ah, they're less conspicuous than chrome."
    He looked up at me and said, "Salvatore, it's not the camera that's
inconspicuous, it's the photographer." As far as I know, Eisie never
purchased a black paint camera but he did have a black chrome M4.
    I still prefer black cameras, but it's nothing more than personal
preference and ones own sense of aesthetics.
    Finally, can anyone tell if a photo was made with a chrome, black or
pink camera?
    This whole discussion is just more LUG silliness......
Happy Snaps,
Sal DiMarco, Jr.
Philadelphia, PA

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] loco for chrome?)
Reply from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] loco for chrome?)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] loco for chrome?)