Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To arbitrarily select the dimension of "literalness" > as a catagorisation basis and claim that it -- somehow -- carries greater > epistemological validity than any other arbitrairily chosen dimension is > just academic codswallop. > > M. > Can't disagree with that, Martin, even from my high perch up here above the clouds...;-)...I was more interested in the general question, and was thinking back to wazername the pedantic would-be-intellectual and her observations about the lack of "accuracy" if you will in photographs. The Picasso thing is amusing, but makes a point - even the most accurate photograph of a person or event leaves out more than it includes, and therefore is a slice of something, but is not a whole, accurate, picture of that something...Just my Godly two cents worth.:-) TLFKAG