Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Loupes
From: Douglas Cooper <douglas@dysmedia.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:38:25 -0500

On 2/12/01 11:41 AM, Leica Users digest expressed the following:

> You guys who use camera lenses as loupes are joking right?


Not at all.  Many Olympus users consider the 50/1.8 Zuiko the perfect loupe
(and you can get one for about 20 bucks).  I was stuck without a loupe the
other day at the lab, and I used my DR Summicron rather than the lousy loupe
they had chained to the light table -- worked like a dream.  No, you don't
always get the whole frame (depending on the focal length of your lens), but
loupes are mostly for critical work, no?

I've used the Maxwell loupe, and had difficulty with focus -- it's not
adjustable, and if your eyes are wrong, as mine are, you're out of luck.
That said, it's considered the best loupe out there -- the FBI uses it --
and I have one of his ground glass loupes for large format, which is superb.

The Schneiders are of course wonderful; you might want to consider the Poor
Man's Schneider -- the Iston 4x -- which is about 50 bucks from B&H.  I use
this, and the difference between it and the Schneider is slim.

For general work, 4x or 5x is what you want -- a 10x will drive you crazy,
as all you'll see is massive grain, and imperfections in the surface of the
film.  10x is great for truly critical work -- evaluating the sharpness of a
line, for instance -- but is not an everyday affair.

cheers,

Douglas Cooper
http://www.dysmedia.com

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Loupes)