Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] focus inaccuracies: my test results
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:22:12 -0800
References: <NBBBIDNIGLFOKNLJCPLHMEEKFFAA.danh@selectsa.com> <3A869E87.D45530D5@sympatico.ca> <3A86FF70.E1893C4C@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <00a701c094ab$112798a0$906a3b3f@PACBELL.NET>
Tom Schofield wrote:
>
> I don't think you can just use a yardstick. It appears that the scale on
> the diagonal shows the distance along the side parallel to the way the
> camera is looking. That's why they charge $295, but you could no doublt
> make one cheaper if you felt so inclined.
>
> Tom
>
Not a cheap yardstick. A metal expensive one. Three foots worth!
mark rabiner
In reply to:
Message from "Dan Honemann" <danh@selectsa.com> (RE: [Leica] focus inaccuracies: my test results)
Message from Bernard Cousineau <flatbroke@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] focus inaccuracies: my test results)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] focus inaccuracies: my test results)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] focus inaccuracies: my test results)