Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It will be alright as long as you don't develop advanced cirrhosis of the wallet in which case you might require a transplant to a lowly Canon or Nikon in order to carry on. >From: "Craig Semetko" <csemetko@earthlink.net> >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Subject: [Leica] Re: Leicaholic >Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:14:41 -0800 > >Martin, > >You have no idea how disturbingly accurate this is. (I'm currently in the >R-series 100 APO petunia phase) > >Have you ever considered becoming a Profiler for the FBI? > >Craig > > >Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 22:33:02 -0500 >From: Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu> >Subject: [Leica] <no subject> >Message-ID: <B6A8CF1E.59D7%howard.390@osu.edu> >References: > >Juan Buhler recently admitted to Leicalust, thinking that he would be able >to survive the condition without succumbing to the full-blown symptoms. >How >sadly mistaken he is. He wrote: > > > Anyone selling a beat-up, working non TTL black M6? > >You see M6 classics in EX/EX+ condition for around $1100-$1300 these days. >They seem to hold pretty stable around there. > > > Otherwise, does anyone have any tips on how to avoid falling into > > an endless spiral of expensive body and lens purchasing? > >That is impossible. You will spent more than you bargained or thought >possible on Leica lenses. You will initially get one body and one lens >(one >of 35mm/50mm/90mm). Then you will rationalize that a useful minimum kit >really consists of all three lenses (35mm/50mm/90mm). In the meantime, you >may acquire one or more of the new Cosina LTM lenses just for fun, but they >don't really count. > >Having acquired all three, you'll notice that (a) that you miss your best >shots when you are changing lenses, (b) changing lenses is cumbersome, (c) >there are different bodies with different viewfinder magnifications and >that >you really do need that higher mag VF to get the most out of your 90mm >lens. >So, you will buy a second body. In the meantime you may have picked up a >Bessa-L or an old IIIc for some of those LTM lenses, but they don't really >count. > >Suddenly, you'll start to notice how some of the most fabulous looking >photographs are taken with the 50mm f/1.0 Noctilux, the 75mm f/1.4 >Summilux, >or the 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. You'll start to notice that different Leica lenses >of the same focal length have different imaging characteristics and you'll >use this to justify the purchase of your forth 50mm lens and your third >35mm. Of course, you'll need something to carry this stuff in, but don't >want to advertize that you're carrying expensive camera equipment, so >you'll >end up spending $300 on a camera bag that has been carefully crafted and >designed to look like it cost $25. Of course, everyone else carrying >$7,500 >worth of Leica equipment will have the same bag, but that doesn't bother >you. > >Then some poor soul will be desperate to make his house payments and you >buy >his black paint M6 LHSA limited edition just to be a friend -- and because >the deal was too good to pass up. Black paint fever strikes, and you >rapidly acquire an M6 Millenium, M2 black paint, and have your original M3 >repainted in black enamel. Three weeks later you realize that your chrome >90mm lens looks silly on a black painted M3, and you buy another M3 (in >chrome) to have a matching set. > >Your interest in macro-photography is suddently awoken when someone shows >you the pictures they took of the wife's petunias in the back yard. You >just know that your wife would love some shots of her petunias too, so you >decide to get a small macro outfit, just the essentials. Of course, the M >system is notoriously difficult to use with macro stuff, but that doesn't >stop you from acquiring an entire Visoflex IIa system, until you realize >that what you really need is the R8 and 100mm f/2.8 APO-Macro-Elmarit-R >with >the 60mm f/2.8 Macro-Elmarit-R just as a back-up. For a while you have the >idea of chasing insects with the 180mm f/2.8 APO-Elmarit-R, 2x APO extender >and a Macro-Adaptor-R, but you realize that the whole thing is just too >impossible to hand-hold. Again, switching lenses becomes a pain (not to >mention winding on the film), so you buy another R8 and two motordrives. > >Of course, with the R8, you now have the perfect platform for taking those >great telephoto shots of shy animals in the treeline close to where you >live, and they're such cute animals so you're practically guaranteed to win >some major award, or make a killing in the stock photography market. You >use this to justify the purchase of a $3,000 280mm f/2.8 lens which you >consider to be an increadibly good deal, because the guy selling it threw >in >a $400 122mm front UV filter with the deal, but you'd never actually use >the >UV filter, because now you've become obsessed with the image-degrading >qualities it can have. > > > Will I become a Leica snob? > >Without a doubt. In fact, already now you're trying to find faults with >the >Bessa-R or the Contax G, and will in a few weeks time be able to construct >half-hour long arguments as to why you need to spend as much on one Leica >body as you could on acquiring an entire Pentax K camera system. > > > Should I go to school, become a dentist, and then retire before gettig >one? > >No. You will not be able to afford an education once you buy that first >M6. > > >Welcome to the gang! > >;) > >M. > >- -- >Martin Howard | Flawed beauty is much more >Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU | interesting >email: howard.390@osu.edu | than perfect beauty >www: http://mvhoward.i.am/ +--------------------------------------- > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.