Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ken; How would you rate the angenieux 70-210? This lens always tempts me because it is so light. Slobodan Ken Wilcox wrote: > > I have and use the 180 Elmar. I cna't compare it to the other lenses of > this length because I've never had the opportunity to use them. I like the > Elmar because it is small and light for a 180. I don't find it quite as > sharp as the 80-200 f/4 Vario Elmar, which is superb. > > Ken Wilcox > > At 7:09 -0800 1/7/1, a fine scholar, stefan smith wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I'm thinking of investing in the R system to go along > >with my M. Looking at the 24mm f2.8 -- Erwin seems to > >say this is OK but about level with the Nikon 24mm and > >not up to the M 24mm ASPH. Any users out there want to > >share their experiences? I may go for a 28mm if it is > >is a better performer even though it's not as wide. > >Also the 180mm f4 seems a good buy, and alot cheaper > >than the f3.4 APO - any comments on this one? > > > >As for the body I'm set on an R6.2. > > > >thx in advance. > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > >http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > ---- > Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits > preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com> > <kwilcox@gfn.org>