Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Apropos a thread on another mailing list, I just wondered something about Eggleston. Not to start another war, but *clearly* some folks (me and Rob Appleby and several others on this list) find his work riveting wheras *clearly* some folks (Jim Brick and others) find it....well I won't put words in their mouths but it doesn't float their boat. Here's the question, anyway: how much difference does it make that he shoots with a 35mm camera (a leica of course)? If those pictures had been taken with a big lumbering 8x10, would you view them differently? I ask this because I have in the past been accused of snapshooting or random shooting, but my pictures with a 4x5 are really not much different, yet I think it would be hard to accuse someone of snapshooting with one of these things. You have to bite on the intentionality, I mean. My guess is that if E******* had shot his pix on a larger format the argument might have been somewhat different. I don't suppose he would have won any new converts BUT I think perhaps people would have had to spend a little longer looking at the pictures trying to work out what he (and others) saw in them. The kicker is, of course the format is irrelevant in the end, and its the picture that matters... - -- Johnny Deadman http://www.pinkheadedbug.com