Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]These are the results of my Leica R8 survey. 19 people reponded to my query and I got data on 31 cameras. Clearly this is a very low number: I'm sure that Leica has sold many, many more camera bodies than these 31: so bear this in mind when reading this. Secondly, out of the 31 cameras reported, 14 have always worked perfectly, one camera body worked but the motor drive failed to rewind when attached to it (subsequently adjusted by Leica), and the remaining 15 had problems which required repair. Another thing to bear in mind is that it is VERY likely that owners with cameras that have developed faults were more vocal in reporting than those with perfect cameras. Several people expressed gratitude at someone actually willing to listen to their stories and take them seriously -- all, with one exception, had had problems with their R8s. So, bearing that in mind, here is the list: 2,285,xxx Complete lock up. Returned to Leica. 2,285,xxx Faulty rewind release caused film to be scratched unless held down during rewind. 2,292,xxx Unreliable rear LCD panel. 2,292,xxx Light leak through shutter. Repair by Leica, twice. Subsequently developed a faulty light meter (spot meter wouldn't lock). 2,293,xxx Light leak through shutter. 2,293,xxx Defective rear LCD panel. Returned to Leica. 2,297,xxx DOF lockup, buckled shutter. 2,298,xxx Problems with winder. 2,298,xxx Strange indications on rear LCD. Problems shutting back cover. 2,298,xxx Scratched film, problems shutting back cover. 2,412,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,413,1xx OK -- no problems. 2,413,xxx Skipped frames when used with MD. Repaired by Leica. Failed to work at all with MD three weeks after return. Repaired again by Leica. 2,416,xxx OK. Leica replaced a switch during routine maintenance (had to do with motor/winder contacts). This was a preventative measure: no problem had been experienced. 2,416,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,417,xxx Faulty light meter (spot meter wouldn't lock). 2,421,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,428,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,428,xxx Dead in box. 2,434,xxx OK -- no problems. MD (000xx) OK. 2,430,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,462,xxx Jammed upon winding with winder, every time. 2,464,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,465,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,465,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,465,xxx OK. MD (009xx) failed to rewind film. Camera had MD drive coupling adjusted by Leica. 2,475,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,475,xxx Aperture control lever failure jammed the lens to the body. 2,475,xxx Aperture control lever failure jammed the lens to the body. Shutter curtains developed problem, needed replacement. 2,476,xxx OK -- no problems. 2,476,xxx OK -- no problems. There *appears* to be a pattern here -- later cameras seem less prone to problems than earlier ones. In particular, we can note that all cameras with a s/n of 2,298,xxx or less have developed problems. Mikiro (arbos@mac.com) has been collecting data on the various generations of the R8. He reports the following: I am now collecting info about R8 generations and revisions. I heard that R8s have been made in the following four generations. 1st: SN 2285000-2422000 2nd: SN 2427001-2435800 3rd: SN 2464101-2477300 4th: SN higher The current generation has electronic boards much more resistant to static damage. They are said to be trouble-free unless you open the top covers. Joseph Yao (yaojkfdr@netvigator.com) is a distributor for Leica cameras and reported some time back on the LUG that he was getting new cameras with lower serial numbers. Perhaps this is a concious effort on the part of Leica to confuse the issue -- otherwise potential buyers might stay away from low serial numbers and thus Leica would be stuck with lots of unsold stock. This, however, is speculation on my part. Conclusions? As several people suspected, including myself, this is far too little data to draw any conclusions from. It would *appear* that there is a trend: bodies with later s/n are more reliable than ones with earlier s/n. However, there is are two problems with this reasoning: The aforementioned experience of Dr. Yao, and that fact that some cameras when repaired by Leica are completely replaced -- although the serial number remains the same. I know of at least one camera to which this has happened. Since the s/n is printed on the camera base plate, the entire body can be replaced with a new one, just retaining the baseplate. In closing, I would like to thank those 19 people who participated in this survey, and especially those whose cameras have always worked perfectly: they had less incentive to make the effort. I'm very grateful for your participation. Ultimately, I guess, the question is: Would I personally buy an R8? The answer is, yes, I would. It is the best manual focus SLR out there, in my opinion. I would want to buy it either from an individual I know and trust who could test the camera for me, or in person. And I would test it with a winder or drive before parting with my money. However, at the moment, as a struggling PhD student, I need to divert my funds towards other things than esoteric camera equipment. M. - -- Martin Howard | Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU | People don't like to be parameters email: howard.390@osu.edu | in an equation. www: http://mvhoward.i.am/ +---------------------------------------