Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: 75/1.4 question (was: Homicide and photography)
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 19:17:09 -0800
References: <4.1.20001207174625.016e7580@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com> <3A301C36.230B6204@home.com> <80.3ebdc42.27616633@aol.com> <3A301C36.230B6204@home.com> <kub03t8nj2kvmintb4jbmqk47u6al8t2id@4ax.com> <4.1.20001207174625.016e7580@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>
At 09:02 PM 12/7/00 -0500, Paul Chefurka wrote:
>On Thu, 07 Dec 2000 17:47:15 -0800, Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> wrote:
>
>>At 07:54 PM 12/7/00 -0500, Paul Chefurka wrote:
>
>Knew I could count on you, Jim.
>
>Seriously, that 75 is as good as everyone says it is.
>Paul
>
I have a 75/1.4 . It is indeed stellar!
Jim
In reply to:
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: 75/1.4 question (was: Homicide and photography))
Message from Ted <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Homicide and photography)
Message from Maciver2@aol.com (RE: [Leica] Homicide and photography)
Message from Ted <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Homicide and photography)
Message from Paul Chefurka <chefurka@home.com> ([Leica] 75/1.4 question (was: Homicide and photography))
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: 75/1.4 question (was: Homicide and photography))