Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> How do the various Leitz lenses compare? > What about Schneider and Rodenstock current models? > Any others? > Whats the best for a Focomat? Henry: When I bought my Focomat 1c, it came with a Leitz Focotar 4.5 (if I remember correctly), until someone on the LUG mentioned using a Schneider Componon-S 50/2.8 on a 1c. I liked the idea of f/2.8 for easier (brighter) focusing. I ordered one from B&H and sold the Focotar. I have no complaints, despite that: - - I had to remove the aperture ring lever in order for the lens to fit properly into the enlarger. The lever is removable via a single screw (it's not a hack job). The lever includes a backlit aperture number so you lose that feature, but just count the half-stop clicks down from f/2.8 when you stop down, and it's no problem telling what aperture you select. - - since I don't have the proper Leitz extension tube, I stuck a spacer in an appropriate spot on the enlarger's focusing mechanism to "bias" the lens into a suitable distance from the light housing. I needed to do this in order to get a good focusing range at typical enlargement sizes. Focomat 1c users: non-Leitz lenses will likely cause the mechanical autofocus feature to not work. I don't know this for a fact but you might want to check into it. Do I notice a difference in the image quality between the Focotar and Componon, even after looking at side-by-side prints at two different apertures? No -- absolutely none! But the bright max aperture sure helps focusing, and the quality of the lens is superb all-around (still doesn't "feel" as slid as the Focotar). - --Andrew