Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] UV filter for Noctilux-measurable light loss??
From: Nicholas Poole <nick.botton@camphill.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 00 11:43:17 +0000

>>In a coal mine at midnight with one candle off in another part of the cave 
you
>>have only 5 units of light to work with.
>>You don't want to loose one.
>>Could that be true? Seems like it would be.
>>mark rabiner
>>:)
>>http://spokenword.to/rabiner/
>
>That's it exactly, Mark.  It only matters when you are measuring darkness, 
>not light!
>
>Tina

Hi All,

My original question to Tina was: "a UV filter cuts light?? OK, some, but 
can you measure it?"

I did not ask about vignetting (a quite different issue), or whether Mark 
spends his midnights down coal mines, but does it make a discernible 
difference to the exposure? Tina says it does, and I respect her 
subjective experience, but I wanted to know what *measurable* difference 
there is, if any.

Mark's logic sounds fine but skates around the question. 1 in 5 is 20% 
and no one wants to lose 20%! But who says a UV filter cuts 20%, Mark? 
That's neutral density filter territory. No matter what the absolute 
light level (beach or coal mine), the question was what *proportion* of 
it does a UV filter cut? And is it significant?

An aside to Tina: What instrument do you use to measure darkness? ;-)
Nick.