Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well - Konica is not so big an advertiser - and you did not notice the qualifier. All the best! Raimo photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen - -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Päivä: 13. marraskuuta 2000 20:26 Aihe: Re: Vs: [Leica] hexar vs leica lenses >Raimo Korhonen wrote: >> >> Well - PopPhoto tested them (June 2000) and wrote: "These are simply three of the best lenses we have ever tested in their respective focal lengths". Note that they say "of the best" and not just "the best". >> According to Erwin the Leica lenses are still THE best - and I suspect that Erwin uses even larger magnifications than the 20x24" of PopPhoto. >> As I have no personal experience of these lenses, I cannot comment any further. >> All the best! >> Raimo >> photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen >> >Raimo really how are these cheap lens going to be better than Leica lenses???!!!!! >Just hold one in your hand and look at it! Check the price tag! >It IS true you don't always get what you pay for but is this really an example >of that? >PopPhoto's credibility goes right down the drain when they make such ridiculous assertions. > >PopPhoto tested them (June 2000) and wrote: "These are simply the biggest new >advertizing account and source for continued revenue we have taken on for a long >time." >(parody) > >mark rabiner >:) >http://spokenword.to/rabiner/