Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Photography is partly craft, partly technique and partly art. Tools and techniques in photography allow a remarkable and intriguing versatility of style and content of the images produced. We can select emulsions that support high resolution imagery, we can use emulsions that maximise grain impressions or we can use techniques to lengthen the tonal scale. In fact the variety of options is endless as every element in the processing chain, camera, lens, film, developer, enlarger, scan, digital print has its own bandwidth of options. We can freely mix any element and choose within every element any characteristic that is available to produce the image we want and are proud of. If someone wishes to mix elements and characteristics that exploit maximum resolution, fine. If someone wishes to select elements and techniques that allow pictures in the style and atmosphere of the great street photography masters, fine. Non is inherently superior, both are valid and on equal footing. If one wishes to mix definition and tonal scale to produce pictures like Helmut Newton's BIg Nudes with 35mm equipment, fine. If one fully concentrates on pictures to the art part and uses the tools to produce imagery that is in the tradition of currently accepted forms of the visual arts, fine. There is no way to fix or define which of these endless combinations of possibilities is closer to the nature of photography. Remember that in painting Van Gogh and Matisse were loathed by established art critics as cannibalising the true art of painting, because they stepped outside established and time honored bounderies. There is no way to predict or even to define what a photograph should look like or what content it should have to be a true representative of the art of photography. Photography in general (and Leica photography is included) is a true liberal art: anything goes as long as the starting point is a mechanical device to reproduce a slice of time/space. From my viewpoint is photography with a Leica pure fun and I freely share my pleasure and experience in pursuing my goals with anybody who has the same goals or is interested in what I am doing. The Prime Directive states that we should accept any culture as it is and let any culture develop its own way and according its own rules. Of course we can study such cultures, exchange knowledge and expertise to enhance our own pursuit of exploring bold new worlds. Maybe we should adopt this approach on the Lug: instead of ridiculising or negating what we do not like, let us be more open. If you take pictures in the HCB style, and someone presents a different approach (hi-res photography as example), you might inquire if there is anything in that appraoch that can help you make better pictures, in stead of negating that approach as being out of scope. The other way around is true to: the Zone System can be a boring exercise in a technique, but it can also enhance your visual awareness and technical capabilities. And using a film as TP may be used in the wrong way by someone to produce pictures without any content, that does not imply that TP could not by its very characteristics add to the expressiveness of an image. And a technically perfect picture could be made more interesting by trying to add some visual creativity in the image. Could we not learn form each other and stop trying to carve up the vast field of photography in watertight compartments where trespassing is not allowed? Erwin