Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital is not photography (was long - shorter but still off topic)
From: Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:25:00 -0500

Johnny Deadman jotted down the following:

> Right, and I would expect that to continue. The signal path is always of
> interest to completists and connoisseurs and curators who have to fill catalog
> space. 'A pigment-ink inkjet print using a customised driver on a modified
> Epson 1160 of a Photoshop-manipulated 4000 dpi 16-bit scan of an APX400
> negative developed in Xtol 1:2 for 12 minutes @ 68F of an image taken using a
> Leica M4-P through a Summilux-M ASPH 35 wide open @ 1/30s".
> 
> Oh, yeah, and what was it of again?

"Chair Leg and Dust Bunnie, no. 17"

M.

- -- 
Martin Howard                     | "Any sufficiently advanced technology
Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU       |  is indistiguishable from magic."
email: howard.390@osu.edu         |               -- Arthur C. Clarke
www: http://mvhoward.i.am/        +---------------------------------------