Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think you've got the order reversed: the state of the art in digital imaging is currently at about the development of a '32 Ford V-8...in its infancy. Qualitatively it's still years behind silver. I delivered a 16x20 print to a customer this afternoon, made from and 8x10 negative. None of these silly little desktops come even remotely close. there's the equivalent of 2 gigabytes of information there. Go waste your money on obsolete technology, if you will, but, for many of us, it's silver for a long time to come :-). Curt On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, B. D. Colen wrote: > Right....And Arthur also won't say that a 2000 Mercedes is "bad," either, he > just doesn't want you to confuse it with the real thing - a Ford Model T.....;-) > > B. D. > > > > ARTHURWG@aol.com wrote: > > > Paul, I'm not saying digital is "bad," exactly; but lets not confuse it with > > the real thing. Arthur > >