Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Kodak T400CN
From: "Rob Heyman" <rheyman@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 22:13:41 +1000
References: <002701c03efb$12ab3f20$e51e2a3f@telecaster>

> Rob, XP2 Super is my B/W film of choice. (I also use Delta 100 & 3200 and
> HP5+, though to a lesser extent.) As you note it scans beautifully, which
> for me is an important consideration since I've restricted my darkroom
work
> for now to the digital realm. But mainly I just like the way it captures
> light. Since the images are formed of dye clouds it doesn't have the
> archival properties of silver films. The same is true of T400CN and
> C41-processed color negative films. But I imagine film scanner technology
> will progress to the point where this won't be an issue long before my
> negatives start fading.
>
> For something different try processing XP2 Super or T400CN in E6
chemistry.
> This should work with the Kodak film, though I've never tried it. You'll
get
> transparencies with a unique look guaranteed to annoy Erwin's Realists.
<g>

Thank you for that. I will try it, although I usually prefer to produce the
best possible negative and then do any manipulating on the computer. That
way if I get a spectacular shot I have a neg that will do virtually
anything. I would hate to be in the position of having ruined a beautiful
shot by processing in the wrong stuff. You can't go backwards after using
E6.


Rob

In reply to: Message from "David Kieltyka" <daverk@email.msn.com> ([Leica] Re: Kodak T400CN)