Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Rocks & Bullets
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:05:54 -0400
References: <200010230701.AAA10095@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <f04310100b61a41e56e78@[192.168.1.2]>

DR. BLACKTAPE HAS A SUGGESTION...
IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE LUG, MIGHT IT NOT BE A GOOD IDEA FOR US TO AVOID ALL
DISCUSSION OF THE MERITS OF THE CASES OF, OR THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF, ANY OF THE
PLAYERS IN THE MIDDLE EAST DRAMA -
Other than photographers, of course....:-)


Bill Lawlor wrote:

> Jesse wrote..
> So the Israelis shoot to kill, Bill? Really? I don't think that the Israelis
> are completely right, but you didn't see the Palestinians raising an outcry in
> horror at the lynching, did you?........
> ..........
>
> Jesse, please don't read anything partisan into my remarks. This is
> certainly not the forum to debate the oldest running animosity in the
> world. My intent was to join in the commentary about the effects of
> journalists on events. Many have said the journalists' presence may
> sometimes incite staged violence; I said their presence as witnesses
> may sometimes inhibit some violence. In fact, the Hearst papers
> started the Spanish American War almost singel-handedly and the
> efforts of police and armies to exclude journalists from many
> conflicts suggests the bad guys are less likely to commit some
> atrocities under public scrutinty.
>
> Note the use of "some", "may", and "sometimes".
>
> If my intent is not clear please use my personal email for reply and
> not submit the whole LUG to an Arab-Israel, Armenian-Turk,
> Hutu-Tutsi, or other insoluble debate.
>
> Thanks, Bill Lawlor

In reply to: Message from Bill Lawlor <wvl@marinternet.com> ([Leica] Re: Rocks & Bullets)