Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rick You have performed the most proper and valid of all testing methods - determining the image that you like the best. That's what it's all about. Simon RODGERS, RICK wrote: Snip: I don't profess to know much > if anything about the proper testing procedures or photography in general > for that matter. But to my eyes the leica won hands down. > > -----Original Message----- > From: B. D. Colen [mailto:bdcolen@earthlink.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 3:43 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] 90 f/2 or 75 f/1.4 > > > Well, not to start a flamewar, but I defy anyone to successfully pick either > a shot taken with the Summilux 75, a magnificent lens, or the Nikon 85 1.4 > AF D, an equally magnificent lens, out of a pile of photos taken with those > two lenses. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of ..RODGERS, > > RICK > > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 3:02 PM > > To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' > > Subject: [Leica] 90 f/2 or 75 f/1.4 > > > > > > Hello, I am trying to decide on which lens to buy fo my first leica. I > > used a friends m6ttl and 75 1.4 for a week comparing it to my f100 and 85 > > 1.4 and just finished putting the nikon up on ebay. I could not > > get over the > > difference in quality. I do mostly amateur travel photography and > > have been > > shooting for little over a year. My first roll on the leica was > > better than > > my 200th+ roll on the nikon. To the point, I was reading old messages on > > this list and some various reviews on the web and seemed to be getting > > differing opinions on the quality of the 90 2.0 relative to the 75 1.4. I > > realize that the 90 apo version is the newer and presumably > > better model of > > the 90 f/2s available. I would rather sacrifice the extra stop in favor of > > the extra focal length but I don't want to sacrifice the quality > > I saw from > > the 75 1.4. Am I over thinking this? Any opinions appreciated. > > > > Rick > > >