Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have thought about the QZ 35W for a while now, wondering the same about lens quality. The body is big for a P&S, but the features are tremendous. I think it was Godfrey who told me some friends had it and liked it very much. Other than that, I have not found reviews of it. Cameraworld.com has 20% off P&S cameras now, with excellent pricing on the QZ. Tom > >Thanks for your reply. I worry about the too small aperture of Prego 90. If > >lens quality is the first concern, which point & shoot will be your best > >choice? > > > >Robert > > Robert, > > I have no direct experience with neither Minilux nor QZ. But if money was no > object, I would be tempted by the QZ series, because it seems much more > flexible; for instance, shutter speed is up to 1/8000 second, there are several > exposure modes, including the manual one, I think, multiple exposure capability > and that "dandy" little flash. On the other hand, Minilux is probably more > pocket-able. As far as lens quality, I would think both cameras are comparable, > but only someone who used both could tell you for sure.