Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Rollei QZ35
From: "Robert Lin" <robert@digilord.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:18:25 +0800

Jiri,

Thanks for your reply.  I worry about the too small aperture of Prego 90. If
lens quality is the first concern, which point & shoot will be your best
choice?

Robert
- -----原始郵件-----
寄件者: Jiri_Dvorak@idx.com <Jiri_Dvorak@idx.com>
收件者: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
<leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
日期: 2000年10月10日 AM 04:22
主旨: [Leica] Re: Rollei QZ35


>
>>Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:04:42 +0800
>>From: "Robert Lin" <robert@digilord.com>
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I intend to buy a high quality point & shoot camera with zoom capability
>>when I am traveling.  I am considering Rollei QZ35 and Leica Minilux Zoom.
>>...
>>Robert
>
>Robert,
>
>look also at Rollei's Prego series. My daughter has Prego 90 (the lens is
>28mm-90mm Vario-Apogon) and it is a great performer. I would say better
than the
>lens on Yashica T4, that she had before for several years. IMHO, it is very
>close to a Leica lens in out-of-focus area rendition (bokeh). And much
cheaper
>(around US $180) than either QZ series or Minilux.
>
>Just a thought...
>
>Jiri
>====
>http://www.crosswinds.net/~jiridvorak
>====
>
>
>
>
>

Replies: Reply from Andre Jean Quintal <megamax@abacom.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Rollei QZ35)