Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yeah - but is this difference really demonstrable in practice? I have the chrome version (of 1963) and it is very, very, very good. All the best! Raimo photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen - -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Päivä: 08. lokakuuta 2000 17:40 Aihe: Re: [Leica] viso/65elmar >At 08:47 PM 10/8/2000 +1000, A.H.SCHMIDT wrote: >>From what I've read, the black ones are slightly better optically. > >Horst, the first version was chrome and OCMOR/11062; the second lens was >the 11162, and was recomputed optically and redesigned mechanically, and >was in black finish. The first lens was introduced in 1960 and the >recomputed version took its place in 1970. The lens left production in 1984. > >Marc > >msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! > >