Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] a rose is a rose is a rose (more color v bw)
From: Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 16:24:05 -0400

Yes, let's take it to DS.
- -- 
Johnny Deadman

http://www.pinkheadedbug.com

> From: "Tim Spragens" <info@borderless-photos.com>
> Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:51:10 +0200
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] a rose is a rose is a rose (more color v bw)
> 
> On 4 Oct 00, at 14:56, Johnny Deadman wrote:
> 
>> Your wish is my command.
>> 
>> http://www.zing.com/album/?id=4293537785&p=4283817112
>> 
>> Good idea.
> 
> Worth a try, anyway. My expectations were that it would bring out
> the texture of the wall, but it blew out the rose and lost the roofing
> of leaves. I don't know why, exactly - both the rose and upper
> leaves render well in the B/W.
> 
> Did you use channel mixing to get the B/W from the original color?
> 
> Maybe we ought to take this over to DS...
> 
> Tim