Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Still confused (was: 35, 90 and now 50mm?)
From: Paul Chefurka <Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:16:50 -0700

I have to say I really like the image exactly as is.  The enigma, the things
left unsaid, unshown - combined with the graphic element of the paving
stones - either of your suggestions would have included too much information
in the photo, and destroyed its essential mystery.  IMHO.

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Quinn [mailto:mlquinn@san.rr.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 2:55 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Still confused (was: 35, 90 and now 50mm?)
> 
> 
> Oh dear. This is hard.
> I agree completely with your sentiments about the 50.
> But I think the first picture deserved a 35, or a step back, 
> or a 90 degree
> twist of the camera...
> 
> Thanks for the stimulating images!
> 
> Mike Quinn
> 
> 
> Jesse Hellman wrote:
> 
> > Thanks very much to Tim Spragens for posting two of my 
> photographs at
> > the following link:
> > 
> > http://www.borderless-photos.com/hellman/hellman1.html
> >