Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have to say I really like the image exactly as is. The enigma, the things left unsaid, unshown - combined with the graphic element of the paving stones - either of your suggestions would have included too much information in the photo, and destroyed its essential mystery. IMHO. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Quinn [mailto:mlquinn@san.rr.com] > Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 2:55 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Still confused (was: 35, 90 and now 50mm?) > > > Oh dear. This is hard. > I agree completely with your sentiments about the 50. > But I think the first picture deserved a 35, or a step back, > or a 90 degree > twist of the camera... > > Thanks for the stimulating images! > > Mike Quinn > > > Jesse Hellman wrote: > > > Thanks very much to Tim Spragens for posting two of my > photographs at > > the following link: > > > > http://www.borderless-photos.com/hellman/hellman1.html > >