Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bego Mario Garde wrote: > > "Now I think about buying a 50mm lens. But which one?" was my question two > weeks ago and in the meantime I received many answers from the Leica Users > Group. Thank you very much! > > I'm living very close to Cologne and so it was easy for me to visit Leica at > the Photokina. I talked to a very friendly person from Leica about his > opinion and he actually just repeated, what I learned from your answers so > far: > The Summicorn is the best choice for a standard-user regarding sharpness, > low distortion and it generally is fast enough. If I would be willing to pay > double as much for an additional f-stop, I could go for the Summilux. As an > Amateur I probably couldn't see any difference in the quality of both lenses > anyway. > I also took a look at the Elmar M, but I didn't like the handling too much. > And combined with the lens hood it isn't really that much smaller then the > Summicron. > > Well. Actually I thought, I made my decision. But while going back home by > train I read an article in an old Leica Fotografie-issue that I bought at > the Photokina: Somebody from the Leica Academy wrote, that one of the > differences between M-Photography and using SLR-Cameras would be, that the > classic Leica-M-User would limit his equipment as far as possible. A 35 mm- > and a 90 mm-lens (which I both own already) would be more then enough. > > Now I'm still confused, but on a higher level. :-) > > What would you do? "Travel light" and just stick with the 35 and 90mm-lens, > or buy the 50mm Summicron additionaly? What is your experience? Would the > 50mm 'cron be a wise completion or just another heavyweight to carry around? > > Buying a lens can be pretty difficult. :-) > > Bego > -- > http://www.begoundstefanie.de Bego, Yes, buying a leica len$ can be difficult ;) For years I used a 35 and 85, now that I have more to chose from I can't really say it makes a huge difference. Yes it is fun to put a 15 on and go wild shooting, but it is you making the photos, not the lens. For a long time I had a 50 but didn't use it much. Now I'm have picked up a 50 and started using it more and seeing things differently. But I think it's not the lens that limits me, it is me. My advice, not worth that much, is to get a small kit and take photos. With time and $$$ you can add a lens and see where it leads you. If you have specific things you want to do that will lead you to the lens, be it a 21, Noctilux, 135. When you do add a lens and find you are not really using it the resale is high enough that when you look at it from a rental standpoint its not all that bad. Bests, and good luck with the photos! Dennis