Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Paul Chefurka wrote: >No doubt, no doubt. But our esteemed friend Simon was looking for ways to >justify his purchase of the ASPH. Having the pre-asph come out "better" by >any measure doesn't help him rationalize his actions, does it? If you are shooting to make a living and put bacon on your table, then go for the ASPH. If you are like many of us, shooting to make a statement or for pleasure, then anything will do. I have both the asph and non-asph and I am as happy using my non-asph (which incidently gives better bokeh) as with my asph. Dan K. - --------------------------------------------------------------- Don't break the silence unless you can improve on it. ===============================================================