Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 Summicrons
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 15:52:01 -0500
References: <000701c027f0$16592870$0100a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com>

You will not be disappointed.....

Peter Shier wrote:

> Thanks for everyone's responses. Found a nice non-asph at Don Chatterton and
> I'll give that a try.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Austin
> Burbridge
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 2:18 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] 35 Summicrons
>
> Peter, You really have to see it -- it's really tiny! There's a
> photograph of it in the Brian Bower Leica Lens book
>
> A U S T I N .
>
> Email: austin.burbridge@alumni.brown.edu
>
> WWW: http://sprezzatura.net -- Every day, an original picture, a
> stimulating quote, and remarkable links
>
> >I too am trying to decide on a 35mm lens. As I cannot find any specs on the
> >pre-asph, you can tell me why is it more portable than the Summicron asph
> >which weighs in at 255 grams with a 39mm filter and 34.5mm long? That seems
> >very portable to me.
> >
> >Peter
> >

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] 35 Summicrons)
In reply to: Message from "Peter Shier" <pshier@mindspring.com> (RE: [Leica] 35 Summicrons)