Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 4:07 PM -0400 9/22/00, M.E.Berube wrote: >At 10:26 AM 9/22/00 +0100, Guy Bennett wrote: >>boy am i glad that 19 doesn't exists for the m - i probably would have >>forgone the 24 and the 21 to get one of those! > >Guy, > >Canon made a 19/3.5 in LTM that is RF coupled according to Mr. Gandy's site. >http://www.cameraquest.com/ltmlens.htm >He says they are rare, but that's half the fun isn't it? >Carpe Luminem, >Michael E. Berube If you want to use it, the one to get is the FL one and a Canon FL-LTM converter. A _lot_ cheaper, the same optics but not RF coupled. Not a big issue. I used one until the 17/4 Canon FD came out. The 21/3.4 SA is a noticeably better lens. * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com