Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?
From: Dennis Painter <dpainter@bigfoot.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 20:36:37 -0700
References: <39C53EC8.6F75@wenet.net> <001401c020f4$23315ac0$0100a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> <2ciasssf12fbv98sd4t2uelvlqm02rod58@4ax.com> <39C54D56.EF1A0876@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
> Paul Chefurka wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 18:10:49 -0400, "Peter Shier"
> > <pshier@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> > >OK, then why would anyone want the lower mag models?
> >
> > For the visibility of the wide-angle frame lines.  Models like the .58
> > are intended for use with short lenses that can be focussed accurately
> > with the smaller effective baselength.
> >
> If you count the LUG posts complaining about such:
> there 4862 of them.
> It's as if they were listening to us and corrected the problem.
> Or people wrote in.
> Mark Rabiner

On the insane idea that they might be listening, the only thing I can
think of that would convice me to buy another M6 would be fixing the
FLARE!  

And I cannot believe it costs that much. The M2 finder just doesn't have
the FLARE like the FLARING M6 finder. (mine is the M6HM)

Dennis

Replies: Reply from Lucien <director@ubi.edu> (Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)
In reply to: Message from Rich Lahrson <tripspud@wenet.net> (Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)
Message from "Peter Shier" <pshier@mindspring.com> (RE: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)
Message from Paul Chefurka <chefurka@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)