Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 16:01:42 -0700
References: <39C53EC8.6F75@wenet.net> <001401c020f4$23315ac0$0100a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> <2ciasssf12fbv98sd4t2uelvlqm02rod58@4ax.com>
 
Paul Chefurka wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 18:10:49 -0400, "Peter Shier"
> <pshier@mindspring.com> wrote:
> 
> >OK, then why would anyone want the lower mag models?
> 
> For the visibility of the wide-angle frame lines.  Models like the .58
> are intended for use with short lenses that can be focussed accurately
> with the smaller effective baselength.
> 
If you count the LUG posts complaining about such:
there 4862 of them.
It's as if they were listening to us and corrected the problem.
Or people wrote in.
Mark Rabiner
Replies: Reply from Dennis Painter <dpainter@bigfoot.com> (Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)
 In reply to: Message from Rich Lahrson <tripspud@wenet.net> (Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)
Message from "Peter Shier" <pshier@mindspring.com> (RE: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)
Message from Paul Chefurka <chefurka@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Which Leica M6 should I buy?)