Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Righteous indignation
From: "Dan Honemann" <ddh@home.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:17:49 -0400

I just printed this out and tacked it on my wall.  Beatifully stated.

Dan (who can't refrain from praising fine posts out loud)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Peter
> Stamos
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 12:43 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] Righteous indignation
>
>
> "As for Kyle, I think it's fine for him to take pictures of anything he
> wants as well. And to post them, or publish them wherever he likes."
>
> Often disputes involving the ethics of photography are redolent
> of baleful,
> fundamentalist injunctions by ayatollahs and rebbes alike against
> representation, and it is unclear when if at all compassion and artistic
> endeavor intersect. Some of the subjects inhabiting the
> photographs of Diane
> Arbus seem neither more nor less real than those in paintings by Francis
> Bacon. Despite the fact that the causal chain leading to the latter's
> subjects may be more circuitous, only a mad few would presume to
> have told
> Bacon what and whom to depict. Counterexamples abound perhaps, but at the
> risk of conflating whether a work is successful with its right to exist.
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>