Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R6.2 vs R8, R7
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 13:55:47 -0700
References: <004801c00e14$7561eaa0$a01f8ed1@ctu> <003901c00f8b$d81e0250$a01f8ed1@ctu> <39A97270.991AC1B9@sympatico.ca>

Vick Ko wrote:
> 
> I'd like to solicit your opinions on buying an R6.2 or other mechanical SLR
> Leica,
> versus the R8.  Over the last few months, I've read some amusing and disturbing
> 
> stories of malfunctions on R8's.  The R6.2 and R8 appear to have the same list
> price.  I am not looking for highly automated functions - only a simple meter
> will do.  But I am looking for exceptional reliability.<<<<<<<<

Hi Vick,
Unless you absolutely need to be all mechanical with the R6.2,   I'd go
R8 without hesitation, regardless of the LUG reported unfortunate
incidents,  as you've only read the reports of those with malfunctions
more so those many thousands who's R8 has functioned without any twitch whatsoever!

And by now the chances of you having an R8 glitch are minimal, I suppose
like any new camera you could experience one. However, if you have the
new "blue light text readout" in the view finder, it's pretty unlikely
of any grief.

And even with the R7 to R6.2, I'd go  R7 if you don't have to work a
mechanical camera. Not that there is anything wrong with mechanical
Leica SLR's, it's just the simplicity of a few electronic thingies can
make life so much more interesting photographically.

By the way you realize you'll receive at least ten more posts countering
or agreeing with me. Or another out of the blue option altogether.
ted

In reply to: Message from "SML" <inyoung@jps.net> ([Leica] FS: 70-180/2.8 APO-Tele-Elmarit, Box, Warranty, Like New)
Message from "SML" <inyoung@jps.net> ([Leica] New E-mail Address of Focal Point)
Message from Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> ([Leica] Leica R6.2 vs R8, R7)