Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 23:06:21 +0200
References: <e3.8b5fb76.26cdbb7b@aol.com> <000d01c0089d$846d09c0$9133a4cb@rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <399C9BEF.18DAF1BF@home.com> <00af01c00926$6a83be80$9133a4cb@rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <017f01c00928$e8e90120$650a0a0a@slamb> <013601c0092d$edd966c0$9133a4cb@rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au>

You obviously have extremely bad luck, or else you are fishing in the bottom of
the pond. My SL and R8 are both perfect. Of course, the R8 is only 1 year old,
but the SL is from 1974. I am sure the R8 will be just fine.

What statistics are you referring to below? One person's experience is not a
representative sample.

Nathan

Miro Jurcevic wrote:

> Quite frankly the problems and statistics speak for themselves.
>
> Wouldn't any person in this LUG get a bit worried if the vast majority of
> items purchased were faulty at sale. What does that have to do with my
> attitude,

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch

General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/

Replies: Reply from "Miro Jurcevic" <miroj@ozemail.com.au> ([Leica] Re: Re: Why M is so popular?)
In reply to: Message from Photovilla@aol.com ([Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?)
Message from "Miro Jurcevic" <miroj@ozemail.com.au> ([Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?)
Message from "Miro Jurcevic" <miroj@ozemail.com.au> ([Leica] Re: Re: Why M is so popular?)
Message from "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Why M is so popular?)
Message from "Miro Jurcevic" <miroj@ozemail.com.au> ([Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?)