Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Over the last couple of weeks I have been pondering the films that we use in our Leicas and wondering why we choose such a wide diversity. For instance, as I have now gone totally digital, I now shoot Kodak TX400CN when I want a black and white film, and either Kodak or Fuji print and slide film. But why am I differentiating between monochrome, print and slide? Why, for example, do i just not shoot everything on print film - after all it is all going to be scanned before I output it. Why do I shoot slide film at all? Anything that goes to a possible publication is scanned and output to disk. Or why not just concentrate on slide film and do all my printing from that, converting it to monochrome should I need to? I don't know about others, but I have a psychological problem 'seeing' in black and white when my brain knows full well that there is colour emulsion in the camera. Is this a common malfunction of our brains, or am I unique in this? I know a number of good digital monochrome workers who shoot solely in colour now, doing the conversion on the computer with no trouble. And I fully appreciate that if I just shoot tranny then I may have problems with contrast if I try printing in black and white, but surely that can't be that difficult to control (even if that involves two changes in my brain - positive > negative > monochrome.) At the risk of starting major debates, does anyone else have these thoughts and anything to add? I, for one, am sticking with the three film types at the moment but I am trying to get my brain used to the colour film/monochrome print battle. Gerry