Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Diffraction limited; bo-ke
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:20:52 -0700
References: <B5A07FD7.BC30%chrislee@mac.com> <000d01bff4ef$d3a48980$e0ef1c18@triad.rr.com> <397B45BC.7C6389AB@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <006c01bff590$928a5be0$e0ef1c18@triad.rr.com>

Dan Post wrote:
> 
> MArk-
> Sounds reasonable!
> Remember- this diffraction as a factor in lessening contrast, and possibly
> sharpness also applies to the enlarger lens as well!
><Snip> 
Diffraction is supposed to be a much bigger issue with enlarging lenses than
camera lenes I've read.
There are now enlarging lense out there that Don't stop down at all you use them
as is.
And I think there is one out there with no aperture blades but a series of
plates with perfect holes in them that you insert in for different F stops.
Intriguingly hard core. Now that I am Zig aligned I'm stopping down a lot less
and enjoying it more!
And that warm stuff is slow!
Mark Rabiner

Replies: Reply from Kip Babington <cbabing3@swbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Diffraction limited; bo-ke)
In reply to: Message from Chris Lee <chrislee@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Diffraction limited; bo-ke)
Message from "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] Diffraction limited; bo-ke)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Diffraction limited; bo-ke)
Message from "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] Diffraction limited; bo-ke)