Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Robert Appleby and Ken Wilcox noted, in earlier posts, that they are not good landscape photographers, and Doug Herr noted he prefers wildlife:- While walking my dog in a conservation area today, I was taking pictures of "things" that caught my eye - reflections on the water of a pond, a purple flower silhouetted against a tree, a log with moss growing on it, a pool of light in the forest, bright leaves against a dark background - "things" that stimulated a desire to retain the image, and represented a challenge to see if what you saw can be reproduced in the print. This may not be landscape photography, as such, but it is working with the landscape in a micro way. We all are interested in different things, for instance, my wife does not see many of the "things", I see, as interesting to her. Perhaps I am more observant of visual "things". When I was lucky enough to work with a more experienced photographer on a regular basis, he had me doing some basic exercises, shooting solid colour only for a day, or, if black and white, looking for stripes, or, only looking down, and this stimulated my eye. Perhaps, by going back to the basics, we can open up new avenues for our photography, and give ourselves immense pleasure at the same time. Cheers for now - Hugh Thompson